HomeDashboardChartsResearchPersonsBubble MapMethodologyGlossaryGlobe

Futures vs physical, across exchanges, over time

Web-verified 2026-06-08. Structured + edges + sources: macro-futures-vs-physical.json. Source discipline: much commodity commentary is perma-bull/manipulation-themed (SchiffGold, Sprott, DiscoveryAlert, 24/7) — used only for market-structure facts checkable against exchange/CFTC data. Documented enforcement is fact; blanket "suppression" is graded contested. Overlay, not used in the proofs.

The idea: price is made in paper, the good is delivered in physical

The headline commodity price is set in leveraged futures on one venue; the deliverable good trades on others (LBMA, LME, SGE/SHFE, DGCX, physical spot) at different prices. The divergence tells you where paper ≠ physical:

Gold & silver (2025–26) — structure facts strong; suppression contested

Copper (2025) — strong (exchange + policy record)

Oil (2025–26) — strong (ICE/CME curve data)

Three benchmarks price "oil" differently: WTI (US light-sweet), Brent (waterborne, slight premium to WTI), Dubai (Asia sour) — physical differentials (sulfur/density/freight) mean the futures benchmark isn't the barrel a refiner buys.

Zero-trust conclusion

Treat the futures print like a BLS headline — the most tradable, not necessarily the most physical, number — and cross-check it against backwardation, cross-exchange premia, registered/eligible stocks, lease rates, and the Eastern physical bid. This complements the gold lens (macro-gold-silver-reprice): not only are nominal gains debasement, the metal price itself is a paper construct that physical periodically overrides.

← Research index · structured data: macro-futures-vs-physical.json · macro-futures-vs-physical.md