HomeDashboardChartsResearchPersonsBubble MapMethodologyGlossaryGlobe

FDIC Aggregate US Banking Industry — what the data shows

Narrative compiled 2026-06-06 from macro-fdic.json (FDIC BankFind financials API https://api.fdic.gov/banks/financials, cross-checked vs the published Quarterly Banking Profile). Validation: computed unrealized-securities figure matched FDIC's published QBP to within $0.2B (2026Q1: −$325.3B computed vs −$325.1B published).

1. The unrealized securities-loss hole (the rate-shock overhang)

The industry still carries a large negative AOCI / unrealized loss on securities (AFS+HTM) from the 2022 rate shock — it has improved but not healed:

QuarterUnrealized securities loss
2024Q1−$517B (peak of this window)
2024Q4−$481B
2025Q2−$396B
2025Q4−$306B
2026Q1−$325B (ticked back up)

Three years after the SVB failure the system still sits on ~$325B of underwater securities — a latent capital hole that re-widens whenever long rates rise. This is the channel through which macro stress (rates) → bank capital — and it interacts with everything below.

2. CRE: slow grind, not (yet) a break

3. Consolidation and failures (1999 → now)

4. Deposits and the DIF

Read for the bubble thesis

The banking system is not in acute distress, but it carries two slow-burn vulnerabilities that the AI-capex story plugs into: (1) a $325B unrealized-loss sensitivity to rates — and the AI buildout is issuing a wall of new corporate/datacenter debt that pressures long rates; (2) the real CRE/credit risk has migrated off bank balance sheets into nonbanks/private credit — which is exactly where AI-datacenter financing now lives (see macro-cre-privatecredit.md: bank loans to NDFIs ~$1.97T). The banks look clean partly because the risk moved to where the AI money is.

← Research index · structured data: macro-fdic.json · macro-fdic.md